Tuesday, June 02, 2009

'Why are so many Lutheran pastors becoming Roman Catholic?'

Here's a short article I put together for St Paul's Box Hill's parish magazine 'The Inside Story'. The question in bold was put to me, what follows is my response.

Any Question: Why are so many Lutheran pastors becoming Roman Catholics?

And not just in Australia? Why, around the world, are a number of Lutheran pastors, some of them leading theologians, resigning their calls and being received into communion in the Catholic Church?

Not, it seems to me, because they have rejected the things that we hold dear: the Scriptures as the Word of God; the Sacraments as the means of the Holy Spirit; even the teaching that we are justified by God’s grace alone on account of Christ through faith. At least in their own understanding, they continue to confess the very things that are of central importance for us, and that have power to bind us together as God’s people in this world.

Not, it also seems to me, because they feel frustrated by a church that doesn’t suit their taste. Many Lutheran pastors leave congregations in which they feel at home not only spiritually but also culturally. They move into churches where the songs at worship are unfamiliar and often poorly sung; where they have no or few family connections; and where their own wishes regarding the style of worship or the structure of church government count for naught.

Why then? Well, let me offer this way forward: To understand why Lutheran pastors are becoming Roman Catholics it’s a good start to understand what it’s like to be a Lutheran pastor in the first place – and especially to be a Lutheran pastor who is self-consciously committed to proclaiming the Gospel in line with the Lutheran Confessions. (Lutheran pastors who neglect the Lutheran Confessions – who deny, for example, the inspiration of Scripture, the efficacy of the Sacraments, or the divinity of Christ, do not, as a rule, yearn to be reconciled with Rome).

Here I’ll simply offer three aspects of being a Lutheran pastor that may help lay people understand why some Lutheran pastors are becoming Roman Catholics.

Firstly, it seems to me that to be a Lutheran pastor is to be somewhat Catholic to begin with.

Lutheran pastors, especially in our own Australian Lutheran Church, are conscience-bound to teach, for example, some outrageously Catholic-sounding doctrines such as that the bread and wine of Holy Communion are the true body and blood of Christ; that in baptism God really makes people His children; that Christ really was born of the Virgin Mary – that He was and is true God and a real human being; even that God really forgives sins through the absolution.

Pastors who in good conscience teach these things are very far from the Bapticostal churches on the one side, and from the mainline liberal churches on the other. They are not, however, so far from the Catholic Church, especially as it has been developing since Vatican II under the papacies of John Paul II and Benedict XVI. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification stands as a witness, however imperfect, to the way things have been moving.

Secondly, to be a Lutheran pastor is to have an awareness of responsibility not simply to an individual congregation, but also to the LCA and beyond. It is to be particularly aware of the ‘catholicity’ of the church.

In the ordination rite Lutheran pastors promise to accept the doctrinal and pastoral oversight of their president. In other words, pastors understand that however much they may be fond of their own opinions, they have been called by Christ through the church to proclaim not their own teaching, or the teaching that their particular congregation may want to hear, but the teaching of the church.

Now in the Lutheran Church of Australia the presidents evaluate the teaching and preaching of the pastors in their care on the basis of the Scriptures and in line with the Lutheran Confessions. But the question naturally arises: to whom are the presidents accountable?

On the one hand the presidents are clearly accountable to the district pastors’ conferences and the synod. But how does this state or national accountability fit in with the world wide unity of the church willed by Christ? A Lutheran pastor who thinks about this sort of question will at least listen respectfully to the Roman Catholic Church when its bishops, unified throughout the world with each other, and in communion with the bishop of Rome (the Pope), call others into fellowship with them.

Thirdly, to be a Lutheran pastor is to have the responsibility to give moral guidance in difficult situations.

This can be a lonely job, and the temptation can be to abdicate this responsibility, unless there is some clear and authoritative teaching that brings the light of the Gospel into the murkiness of human life.

Thankfully in the Lutheran Church of Australia we have well thought out, Scripturally-based, and Gospel-centered statements on a number of moral issues that arise in the life of any congregation. Thankfully we also have a pastorate that is relatively unified in its teaching from the pulpit.

Even so, the Roman Catholic Church does stand out as a church body that, for all its manifold failings in practice, clearly upholds the dignity and worth of all human life, and calls all people to a life well lived. The Catholic Church stands out as a church body that does not in its teaching easily capitulate to cultural fashions or trends. This reality can be attractive to Lutheran pastors who, through serving their people in difficult and tempting times, are aware that clear teaching and guidance can’t be taken for granted.


Of course, none of these three aspects of what it is like to be a Lutheran pastor can explain why any particular pastor makes the very serious (and no doubt anguish-filled) decision to resign his call and seek fellowship in the Roman Catholic Church. In offering my thoughts on the matter I’ve aimed at helping to give some understanding of how this might happen – of how a Lutheran Pastor, exercising his office in good conscience and conscientiously, may yet take the path to Rome.

6 comments:

Floreat Pica said...

Hi, Fraser,
read your article in that excellent publication. Thanks for providing some insights into an issue which can be confronting and disturbing for people affected.
I can see how Point 3 could apply...IF the pastor was able to continue in his Called role in his new church. As this is clearly not possible, it appears prime face to be a very self-centered, if not necessarity selfish course of action.
It certainly raises the qn of Vows.
Does one similarly walk away from a marriage if not everything is going well?
Still, it is hard to demand that someone act against their concience.
However, there seems to be (as you might posit) a rather large elephant in the vestry.

It wouldn't seem appropriate to raise it in a public forum, however.
When are you next coming to Town? !

regards.

Schütz said...

While Fraser touches upon it in his article, I would add that the "call to communion" was for me particularly strong. As Fraser describes it, a Church whose "bishops, unified throughout the world with each other, and in communion with the bishop of Rome (the Pope), call[s] others into fellowship with them" is hard to resist. I would add that it is not just the present unity and communion of the Church that for me was the clinching factor, but the historical continuity of this communuion with Christ and the apostles that finally won the day.

As for the suggestion that joining the Catholic Church would only be a valid option "IF the pastor was able to continue in his Called role in his new church", that is presuming the validity of the Lutheran Church to issue such a call (ie. to ordain priests) in the first place. This is disputed by the Catholic Church. A Lutheran pastor who becomes Catholic does so in part because he recognises the invalidity of his own ordination on the basis that he comes to recognise that the Lutheran Church has no authority to confer holy orders. As a result, he comes to see precisely that he is exercising a ministry TO WHICH HE HAS NOT BEEN CALLED by Christ. If you wish to use the marriage comparison, it is as if a man has discovered that he has been living in an invalidly contracted marriage - which is hence no marriage at all, but a form of adultery or fornication. That's putting it fairly strongly, but so is the suggestion that his motives are selfishness or a lack of committment to duty.

For those more interested in my actual journey, I refer you to my conversion retro-blog (which one day I will get around to completing) Year of Grace.

Peter said...

The aim of your article seems to be to provide Lutherans with some reasons to understand and respect the decision of a former minister becoming Catholic. In other words, I think you aim to assist Lutherans to 'explain their actions in the kindest possible way'.

As a former minister who suffered from missunderstanding and a certain amount of hurtful 'interpretation' of my move to Catholicism, I thank you for this effort.

As I have commented on my own blog, I don't think you deal with the key reason why the men are converting, but you DO offer reasons which the average Lutheran could understand, respect and yet not be too rattled in ther own faith journey in doing so.

People need to be ready to be rattled in this way so it would be irresponsible to force such a challenge to the faith of people in various stages of their faith journey.

While I may sound harsh in my reflections elsewhere, I am genuinely grateful for your efforts which seek to uphold the eighth commandment for Lutherans and new Catholics alike.

Peace in Christ

Schütz said...

"That's putting it fairly strongly"

I need to apologise for putting it TOO strongly. In attempting to show why Lutheran pastor converts to the Catholic Church are not morally bound by their Lutheran ordination vows, I made a comparison that was indeed "too strong".

My apologies. I did not intend to cast scorn or derision upon the Lutheran Office of the Holy Ministry, which indeed exists for the service of the Gospel and is, for that reason, greatly efficacious to the salvation of many.

hazza said...
This post has been removed by the author.
hazza said...

Hi Fraser,
I'm a friend of Tom Pietsch, he recommended your blog.As a former Catholic I appreciated the sensitivity of your post.
I consider myself reformed Catholic. As a seminarian, I don't always agree with the LCA or the lecturers, but privately I don't have too. Publicly there is of course an obedience to the church and those that have oversight over me. I feel that Catholicism and Lutheranism are growing closer together, and I look forward to the day when we are in complete fellowship. Hope springs eternal.
Blessings
Harry Pickett